Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alphaesthete

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:25, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alphaesthete

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

all I could find were Russian websites... is this notable? (or even real for that matter?) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 11:03, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete apparent attempt to coin a neologism. 28 Google hits, most of which are just big lists of registered domains, confirms this isn't a term in wide use. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:13, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete gSearch failed to find anything reliable, like what the nominator said, most of what I could find were Russian sites. Searching for "Alphaesthete Mark Simpson" resulted in nothing but the article. It is possible that the creator is Mark Simpson himself, and if he is, this article would fail WP:NEOLOGISM .and WP:NFT. In short, this article is about a neologism not in widespread use, has no claim to notability and thus cannot have its own article unless notability is established. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:27, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.